Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home donate | Forums | FAQs | Contributions | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright | Contact | Volunteer Positions | Jobs | Bios
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: ridetheory Date: December 22, 2004 10:04:30am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Quick Show of Hands: Is "Visit" the "worst" film in the archives?

Does anything else even come CLOSE to the level of pure Bulldada camp as this film? Out of what I've seen in the archives, this is just about the cheapest, cruddiest, funniest movie... well, not only in the archives, but EVER.

Does anyone else have any nominees for anything more majestic?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: AppleGirl Date: December 22, 2004 10:29:52am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Yes! It's the worst!

Which of course makes it the BEST.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Steve Nordby Date: December 22, 2004 10:45:20am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Quick Show of Hands: Is 'Visit' the 'worst' film in the archives?

I'll bet this was a cheap TV production made to fill up the time between toy ads directed at baby boomers and their parent's wallets. The idea that Santa sits around in a suburban ranch style house's living room while merrily ordering boys in tights to do his bidding is more than a little disturbing.

I can't help but note that this was made in the same year as (or perhaps a year before?) "Santa Claus Conquers the Martians". Are there any other films by Clem Williams Films?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Marysz Date: December 22, 2004 11:37:18am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Quick Show of Hands: Is 'Visit' the 'worst' film in the archives?

This vintage film site claims to have a rental catalog of Clem Williams films:

http://www.8mm16mmfilmscollectibles.com/VintageMovieMagazines.htm

It's listed under "16MM ENTERTAINMENT MOVIE RENTAL CATALOGS"

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Spuzz Date: December 22, 2004 05:02:15pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Quick Show of Hands: Is 'Visit' the 'worst' film in the archives?

The worst?? As in campy bad?? Well 1 of the worst.. I'm thinking Soapy as well..

But the all time worst (as in ugh bad) is of course Brandon..

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Scott Bot Date: December 22, 2004 10:22:21pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Quick Show of Hands: Is 'Visit' the 'worst' film in the archives?

As far as cheaply made, poorly acted and directed, yes, it's the worst. Many of the other films in the archive are just as stupid, but at least they're professionally done.

However, this one loses a point or two for losing it's camp value and becoming just plain boring at the end.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: ridetheory Date: December 23, 2004 09:33:38am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Quick Show of Hands: Is 'Visit' the 'worst' film in the archives?

Oh, I don't know -- the line about "...the birth of Jesus Christ, HUNDREDS of years ago..." comes near the end, and winds things up with an anti-climactic bang.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Visaman Date: December 23, 2004 06:23:18pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Quick Show of Hands: Is 'Visit' the 'worst' film in the archives?

I went to a "naughty" Xmas party this year, so my ears "pricked" up when I heard "Mr. Rogers" say in the film that the girls would enjoy spanking Santa Baby's dolls.

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)